Subject: Re: [xsl] RDDL as a delivery vehicle for XSLT extensions? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 10:35:01 GMT |
> Not quite so fast. > > 1) Now you need to now syncronize all of the > prefixes across your organizaiton. No. As in other uses (like extension-element-prefixes) the prefix is just a local pointer to the URI. Prefixed son't have to match with the prefixes actually used on function calls. > 2) You are still limited to implementations in the > languages referenced in this imported style-sheet > since there are no other resolution mechanisms. > No. If a processor finds an extension function in some namespace it can do whatever it wants to find a definition for that function. If xsl:script doesn't supply one (or even if it does) it may use some other mechanism. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RDDL as a delivery vehicl, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Thread | Re: [xsl] RDDL as a delivery vehicl, Alexey Gokhberg |
[xsl] Re:, Tomas Hjelmberg | Date | Re: [xsl] [exsl] EXSLT 1.0 - Common, Francis Norton |
Month |