Subject: RE: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer ofindirection From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 10:08:07 -0000 |
> First, this syntax makes a big difference, it is not merely > syntax sugar. With implements="a-unique-uri" I can now put > all of my scripts in a module and share this module across the > organization. With implements-prefix="prefix", I have to > coordinate prefixes across my enterprise in order to > have a central set of scripts? Yuck. Talk about a > maintance nightmare. No, of course you don't, you can use a different prefix in each stylesheet module. As always its the namespace URI that must match, not the prefix. Perhaps the keyword "implements-prefix" confused you, it really means "implements-namespace-denoted-by-prefix", just as "exclude-result-prefix" means "exclude-result-namespace-denoted-by-prefix". Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] re: generation of qnames/, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:scrip, Clark C. Evans |
Re: [xsl] URL rewriting of links on, Colin Muller | Date | RE: [xsl] Working with QNames in va, Michael Kay |
Month |