Re: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer ofindir ection

Subject: Re: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer ofindir ection
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:38:04 GMT
> and I'd still like the attribute to reflect what it means,

But almost no one has made this objection (on this list) about
the existing extension-element-prefixes attribute (prior to the current
thread). This has identical usage, you refer to a namespace by a
currently bound prefix. Why object to the usage on xsl:script?

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread