Subject: Re: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer ofindir ection From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:38:04 GMT |
> and I'd still like the attribute to reflect what it means, But almost no one has made this objection (on this list) about the existing extension-element-prefixes attribute (prior to the current thread). This has identical usage, you refer to a namespace by a currently bound prefix. Why object to the usage on xsl:script? David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:scrip, DPawson | Thread | [xsl] implements-prefix vs implemen, Clark C. Evans |
RE: [xsl] <xsl:include> and Oracle , Ellis, Graham | Date | [xsl] Cache problem, James Brown |
Month |