Subject: Re: [xsl] preceding-sibling From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:07:24 GMT |
> In fact the "preceding-sibling::element[position()=1]" doesnt work at > all .. Go on, give us a clue:-) what's the input look like, what is the context node when you evaluate this expression. When you say "it doesn't work" do you mean you get th ewrong thing? you get nothing? you get an error? David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] preceding-sibling, Borca, Olivier | Thread | Re: [xsl] preceding-sibling, cutlass |
RE: [xsl] preceding-sibling, Borca, Olivier | Date | Re: [xsl] preceding-sibling, cutlass |
Month |