Subject: RE: [xsl] Functional programming in XSLT From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 11:38:55 -0000 |
> Alexey Gokhberg wrote: > The current proposal for <exsl:function> does not conform to > this rule. > In particular, the <exsl:result> feature, with all rules governing its > use, looks a little bit odd for me. You're being polite, I think it's weird! Your <uxsl:define>, I think, is very close to my <saxon:function>. Mike Kay Software AG > > The <esxl:function> (or <uxsl:define>, or any similar > construction) has > a lot in common with <xsl:variable>. Both are obtaining a > value in some > way. The <xsl:return> element from my proposal is modelled after > <xsl:variable>; semantically, it is equivalent to <xsl:variable> which > assigns the return value to an anonymous variable. > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Functional programming in, Alexey Gokhberg | Thread | Re: [xsl] Functional programming in, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] Selecting a descendant ch, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] Xalan Extensions, Mika . Borner |
Month |