Subject: RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Complier? From: "Xu, Xiaocun" <XXu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:49:55 -0500 |
> > There are benchmarks on the web which show the XSLTC to be a good > > performer. > > Oh good! Could you point me at a URL for these benchmarks? > I've seen figures > for other XSLT processors but not for XSLTC. Check out http://www.tfi-technology.com/xml/xslbench.html, it has the best collection of XSLT processors being benchmarked. From their result, XSLTC has one of the best in performance. But be aware of the warning: The figures for non-conformant engines are likely to be skewed by the fact that they are non-conformant. In this test the non-conformant engines are Sun XSLTC and Sabletron. The other engines are either conformant or near enough that it makes little difference to these tests. Is XSLTC still non-conformant? From the look of it, it been Alpha for a long time, any guess when it might GA? Or Alpha 5 is stable enough to rely on? Thanks, Xiaocun Xu Emptoris, Inc. xxu@xxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Compli, Ball, Mike | Thread | RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Compli, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Is this a legal XPath Exp, Phil Gooch | Date | [xsl] saving forms, mat t |
Month |