Subject: Re: [xsl] using few or many templates? From: Larry Garfield <lgarfiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 00:04:49 -0600 |
As a general rule, in XSLT it's better to err on the side of modularity, meaning use multiple templates. The advantage is that you can swap out different templates easily, making the stylesheet more modular and easier to maintain. It's also easier to read that way, both for you and for other people. It's the same logic behind lots of simple, streamlined functions vs. one big all-encompassing function, with most of the same trade-offs. Dan Diebolt wrote: <snippet snip> > Note the first xsl fragment used no apply-templates and > the second fragment used multiple apply-templates. > My question to the list is this: As a matter of style, how > do you trade off these two extremes in coding? From the > simple to most complex situation, the issue of how to > factor your template usage must repeatedly come up. > How do you deal with this? > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list -- Larry Garfield lgarfiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do you have a PalmOS Organizer? Click here to add me to your address book: http://signature.coola.com/?lgarfiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- "If at first you don't succeed, skydiving isn't for you." :-) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] using few or many templates?, Dan Diebolt | Thread | RE: [xsl] using few or many templat, Evan Lenz |
[xsl] using few or many templates?, Dan Diebolt | Date | RE: [xsl] using few or many templat, Evan Lenz |
Month |