Subject: Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name? From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:55:58 -0700 |
> | As I consider the tasks I perform using XSL and XSLT, I don't think of them > | as "stylesheet" tasks. I think of them as "transformation" tasks. XTL > | seems like a better name. Does anyone else trip over the S? > > The XSLT 1.0 spec allows you do use <xsl:transform> > as a synonym of <xsl:stylesheet> to cater to folks like you :-) And me. I've long since made it a practice of shunning "xsl:stylesheet", and I've encouraged users to use "xsl:transform" in some of my articles. Naming is very important, and the "xsl:stylesheet" artifact is somewhat of a blister. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?, Steve Muench | Thread | Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?, Larry Garfield |
Re: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:, Uche Ogbuji | Date | Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?, Uche Ogbuji |
Month |