|
Subject: Re: [xsl] sorting using a precalculated value From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:11:23 +0100 |
> I was ready to build a temporary tree but was wondering if I there was a
> cleaner solution.
looking at your example code it looks like you are trying to build a
sort key that is just the concatenation of the name attributes
from ancestor class elements.
Isn't sorting on such a concatenation would seem the same as
sorting at each level of the tree separately.
then you could use a sort key of @name.
so instead of
<xsl:for-each select=".//class">
do
<xsl:apply templates select="class">
<xsl:sort select="@name"/>
</xsl:apply-templates>
together with something like
<xsl:template match="class">
do whatever you want to do for this class, then do its children
<xsl:apply templates select="class">
<xsl:sort select="@name"/>
</xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:template>
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] sorting using a precalcul, Stephane Bailliez | Thread | RE: [xsl] sorting using a precalcul, Stephane Bailliez |
| Re: [xsl] Re: using format-number(), ericmacau | Date | RE: [xsl] XSL:if condition shows ru, Preethi Suthakar |
| Month |