RE: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused

["Ralof" <ralof@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I see, thanx for the link BTW.
In all examples and recommendations  (well not all, but most of them) 
they suggest using the http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform ns, but
that seems to be a bad idea since it is not supported, are those 
recomendations all dated, or is there any good reason for using that 
instead of http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl ?

I have tried to search, but english is not my native language, so 
I have problem putting together good queries.





Ralof wrote:
> Now, why? :)
> 
> XSL Processor
> Vendor: Microsoft
> Processor version: Original IE5 (or old version of other processor)

You answered your own question.

Please read the MSXML XSLT FAQ at http://www.netcrucible.com/

   - Mike


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list