Subject: RE: [xsl] ordering and iteration problem From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 09:28:02 +0100 |
> I was just wondering why this "design > pattern" was typically described using "document('')//node()" when > "//node()" seemed to be more correct. Because in a typical scenario, the stylesheet author knows how many nodes there are in the stylesheet, but has no idea how many there will be in the source document. Mike Kay Software AG XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Jeni Tennison |
RE: [xsl] Q on <xsl:sort>, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Oliver Becker |
Month |