Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: [XSL] MathML From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 21:35:21 +0100 |
Pedro Pastor writes: > What do you think of using TexML from IBM.Alphaworks tool for MathML-to- > Latex conversion? > TexML, in my view, is redundant. It was useful back when writing XML-to-whatever converters was a bit hard, but now I would say thatwriting XML to TeX directly in XSLT is so easy that we do not need the extra step of TeXML. It does not actually provide any more functionality, just a slight amount of elegance (at the cost of extra step) Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: [XSL] MathML, Pedro Pastor | Thread | [xsl] Re: Para element ??, Jeni Tennison |
[xsl] Re: Para element ??, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] Re:Re:How to simplify the, Jeni Tennison |
Month |