Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL and Namespace From: Mark Nahabedian <naha@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 15:16:14 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) |
Michael Kay writes: > I think this is another case where the spec needs clarification; both > behaviors can be justified. > > In particular, it is not clear which of the following two statements is > intended to override the other: > > (a) (2.6.1) The xsl:import element children must precede all other element > children of an xsl:stylesheet element. I'd expect this clause to just apply to elements in the XSLT namespace and that the author probably just failed to note that. > (b) (2.2) An XSLT processor must ignore a top-level element without giving > an error if it does not recognize the namespace URI. > > I will register this as an issue needing clarification by posting it on > xsl-editors@xxxxxxx > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSL and Namespace, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] MathML, dvdb-rju |
Re: [xsl] XSL and Date, Xiaocun Xu | Date | Re: [xsl] Set of distinct values, Xiaocun Xu |
Month |