Subject: RE: [xsl] document() as extension mechanism From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 07:32:40 +0100 |
> i recently got some ideas for innovative uses of document() in > conjunction with custom-written URIResolver's and XSL input sources. > (Java only examples, sorry). I agree, this is a useful technique, especially because the URIResolver mechanism is supported in all JAXP 1.1 processors, while Java extension functions are still difficult to make 100% portable between implementations. One limitation of the approach is that the URIResolver is given very little context information. Another is that the XSLT processor is obliged to ensure that two calls on document() with the same URL return the same result each time. Mike Kay Software AG > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] document() as extension mecha, Joerg Pietschmann | Thread | RE: [xsl] document() as extension m, Roger L. Cauvin |
[xsl] problem chain templates toget, Xiaocun Xu | Date | RE: [xsl] sorting before transformi, Michael Kay |
Month |