Re: [xsl] <xml:variable> alternative for msxml 2 parser

Subject: Re: [xsl] <xml:variable> alternative for msxml 2 parser
From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:09:17 +0100
for all those who want to use old obselete namespace, here is a coupon/note
u can give to whomever, to help;

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
note to give to superior or financial person, or whomever is justifying the
decision of using old wd- namespace
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
- it is possible to upgrade to latest version of msxsl ( though run beta
versions at your own risk.. )
- if we continue using this obselete version, it will cost more in time and
pain in the very near future
- whenever i speak about the neat things re xml or xslt, it has nothing to
do with this particular flavor that we are using
- all the books and documentation and sample code, or applications that may
be integrated will not use this namespace
- mixing the namespace, as in mixing namespaces, is an extremely poor
architecture decision in this circumstance
- xslt list people will help us more and be kind and send us complete code
examples with free beer
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------

please print and photocopy and air drop on silicon valley.

cheers, jim fuller


----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawrence Mielniczuk" <lwm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [xsl] <xml:variable> alternative for msxml 2 parser


> Out of curiosity, how long do you plan on running obsolete, non-conforming
technology?
> ---LwM---
>
> > Actually I want a soution for IE5 only . Upgrading the browser with
MSXML3
> > will work , but I need a solution for msxml2 parser only
> >
> > Nidhi
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "David Carlisle" <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 3:02 AM
> > Subject: Re: [xsl] <xml:variable> alternative for msxml 2 parser
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > Since <xml:variable> is not supported in this version what is the
> > > > alternative.
> > >
> > > it's not that xsl:variable isn't supported, it is just that it
> > > implements an entirely different language that happens to have been
> > > given the same name.  You can update your IE5 with MSXML3 so that it
> > > correctly implements XSLT. See the FAQ at netcruicible.com
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > > _____________________________________________________________________
> > > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
> > > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
> > > information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively
call
> > > Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
> > >
> > >  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
>
> -------------------------------------
> Lawrence Mielniczuk
> Room 314
> Bodleian Library
> Oxford OX1 3BG
> Tel: (01865) 277 114
> Mobile: 0794 101 5689
> -------------------------------------
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread