Subject: Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML with no root element: Saxon & XT vs. Xalan From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:00:07 +0100 |
Michael Kay wrote: > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>(1.1) An image element > > The XSLT 1.0 specification is clear that the output does not have to be a > well-formed XML document, only a well-formed external general parsed entity. > Which means, in effect, something that would be a well-formed document if > you put a start and end tag around it. Whether you or I happen to like this > spec is somewhat irrelevant. > out of curiousity, would the above output be a well-formed external general parsed entity, given that it starts with an xml declaration? Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] This can't be right, XML , Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML , Rob Lugt |
[xsl] newbie - table cell spanning , amit . pherwani | Date | [xsl] Re: RE: hard core xlt ;-), Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |