<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML with no root element: Saxon & XT vs. Xalan

Subject: Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML with no root element: Saxon & XT vs. Xalan
From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:52:48 +0100
Dylan Walsh wrote:


> To clarify: the syntax for a "text declaration" is exactly the same as
> an XML declaration e.g.:
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> 
> Is that correct?
> 

Not quite.  From the XML recommendation [1] :

[23] XMLDecl ::= '<?xml' VersionInfo EncodingDecl? SDDecl? S? '?>' 
[77] TextDecl ::= '<?xml' VersionInfo? EncodingDecl S? '?>' 

Regards
~Rob

--
Rob Lugt
ElCel Technology
http://www.elcel.com/

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
RE: [xsl] This can't be right, XML , Dylan Walsh Thread Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML , David Carlisle
RE: [xsl] namespace declaration whe, Julian Reschke Date Re: [xsl] This can't be right, XML , David Carlisle
Month