Subject: Re: [xsl] OT: ICFP 2001 (xsl solution?) From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:09:33 +0100 |
we'd also need to wrap a root element round it... any similarly concise one-liners? Mark Nahabedian wrote: > > David Carlisle writes: > > > > > The input language isn't valid XML, there are tags whose names start > > > with digits. > > > > sed -e "s/</<x/g" $1 > tmp.xml ; saxon tmp.xml icfp.xsl > > Well, you'll need to deal more appropriatly with the close tags, but > I get your point. > > My point, trivial as it was, was that an XSLT processor was not > sufficient unless its XML parser was permissive. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] OT: ICFP 2001 (xsl soluti, Mark Nahabedian | Thread | Re: [xsl] OT: ICFP 2001 (xsl soluti, David Carlisle |
Re[2]: [xsl] This can't be right, X, Michael R. Hahn | Date | RE: [xsl] This can't be right, XML , Elliotte Rusty Harol |
Month |