Subject: RE: [xsl] default meta tag Revisted From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:07:47 -0700 |
> > > this will probably get me flamed but you could output to txt > and do what you > > were originally doing. You might have to fiddle with your XSL to get the > > HTML correct again, but it is one way. > > No one ever gets flamed on this list do they? > (except of people using the-language-known-as-xsl-in-ie5-and-ie6, but > they don't count:-) yes, of course, no mercy! :-' :-D > > Using the text as opposed to html or xml output methods wouldn't really > help, as the problem would still be the same, how to ensure that the > output was serialised in the desired encoding. (In fact you can't > _ensure_ any particular encoding is used, the XSL engine can always > ignore the encoding and use (say) utf8 whatever output type is used. > I mean if you use xsl:output set to text then you can do anything you want. He already has the encodings defined per page so he can create a text doc that is actually an html page with an html extension. He can set the encoding for the browser to handle, not the XSL processor. best, Rob XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] default meta tag Revisted, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] default meta tag Revisted, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] default meta tag Revisted, Robert Koberg | Date | [xsl] trouble with contains(), Charles Yates |
Month |