Subject: Re: [xsl] Trying to find a working XSLT processor From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:49:48 +0100 |
> Can someone help me find an XSLT processor that works with the following XML? Or for processors like saxon that can use different parsers, any java sax parser that would eat this. > p.s. and "no, I cannot change my XML" as I believe this is properly > constructed XML and I use dozens of configuration parameters in this > fashion in my slide show document model ... it is just that none of the > other processors I've tried support it I agree that it's well formed (and rxp agrees with both of us) but you wouldn't have to make much of a change to get saxon's default parser to take this, just on your top level file move th elocal subset to an external entity: ie change <!DOCTYPE test [ <!ENTITY % test-include "INCLUDE"> <!ENTITY % test-ent SYSTEM "test.ent"> %test-ent; ]> to <!DOCTYPE test SYSTEM "test2.dtd"> and stick this into test2.dtd" <!ENTITY % test-include "INCLUDE"> <!ENTITY % test-ent SYSTEM "test.ent"> %test-ent; David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Trying to find a working , David Rosenborg | Thread | Re: [xsl] Trying to find a working , G. Ken Holman |
RE: [xsl] Trying to find a working , Sullivan, Dan | Date | RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 , Mulberry Technologie |
Month |