Subject: RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version 1.0 From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:11:22 +0100 |
> Mike Kay wrote: > > The basic idea of having sequences in the data model rather > > than sets is > > that the result of sorting a node-set can be assigned to a variable, > > something which isn't possible in XSLT 1.0. There are then > > mechanisms for > > iterating over a sequence or indexing into it. > > Does that mean that the functions listed in the sequences part > is also viable for node-sets? Yes, that's the intent. The idea is that a variable which in XPath 1.0 holds a node-set, should in XPath 2.0 hold a sequence of nodes, the sequence being in document order with no duplicates. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 , DPawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 , Chris Bayes |
RE: [xsl] <xsl:element> Problem, Dev Chandramani | Date | Re: [xsl] match selection formulae, roger . day |
Month |