Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT browser support From: "Kurt Cagle" <cagle@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 11:07:07 -0700 |
> I've one more question. It's now clear that XSLT is only > supported by New Version of browser or U have to do some extra effort like > Update MSXML 3.0 DLL in replace mode. My question is ... > Should we use XSLT or XSL with XML for presentation? If there is any way you can do the download to your clients, use XSLT. Not only is it a superior language, but you're going to find fairly quickly that there are fewer people that will want to code to the older MS implementation, it will make your code base easier to maintain, will make it easier to get code samples off the web (or from books) and you can use the same XSLT on both client and server. If you can't do the download, then think about architecting a server side solution instead using XSLT (you should think about doing that anyway if you're looking at XSLT on Netscape as well), simply because it makes it easier to control the minor variations that do exist in the HTML implementations. -- Kurt Cagle XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT browser support, Pranav | Thread | [xsl] JScript extension function, w, Ilya Khandamirov |
Re: XPath 2.0: Conditional Expressi, Jim Melton | Date | [xsl] Node's content modification, Auguste Oumar |
Month |