Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: XSL-List Digest V3 #1090 From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:59:41 +0100 |
> > Since your dates are suitable for lexicographical ordering, > > how about the following (almost literally copied from > > http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect2/N6461.html#d194e703): > > <xsl:variable name="maximum"> > <xsl:for-each select="//revision"> > <xsl:sort select="@date" order="descending" /> > <xsl:if test="position() = 1"> > <xsl:value-of select="."/> > </xsl:if> > </xsl:for-each> > </xsl:variable> > > This didn't work.... It should work. Either there's something about your source document or stylesheet that you haven't told us, or you're using a buggy processor. Mike Kay > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: XSL-List Digest V3 #1090, Gustaf Liljegren | Thread | [xsl] Re[2]: correct use of keys?, Dimitre Novatchev |
RE: [xsl] catching the last node st, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] catching the last node st, Dimitar Peikov |
Month |