Subject: Re: [xsl] forwarding only existing parameter From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:05:40 +0100 |
> Cause i have the following structure so I guessed:-) what I meant was don't do that, do something else (perhaps) either arrange that your parameter s never empty, but always has the default value, or let the default value be empty and in your specific-item1 test for empty and do the default action. Depending on how many templates pass on the parameter one of these approaches may (or may not) end up looking nicer than the code you had working. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] forwarding only existing , Guillaume Rousse | Thread | Re: [xsl] forwarding only existing , Tony Graham |
Re: [xsl] forwarding only existing , Tony Graham | Date | [xsl] Union of two node-sets not pr, Joel Beach |
Month |