Subject: [xsl] Re: Re: RE: Namespace incompatibility b/n XPath 2.0 Data Model and XPath 1.0 (Was Re: XML schema general convert with XSLT (namespaces..)) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:33:03 -0700 (PDT) |
Evan Lenz wrote: > > Dmitre Novatchev wrote: > > The XPath 2.0 Data Model document doesn't mention that there is a change in the > > above definition. Any misunderstanding would have been avoided, if this had been > > explained in the document. > > Besides going beyond the scope of the data model document (which talks > nothing about axes or other constructs of the XPath language), such an > explanation would be too committal given the WD status of the document and > the editorial note that states "this is still the subject of debate". The > implication here is that there are other proposals on the table. I understand that right now we have only a partial, not final picture from one document (the data model). I have just signaled that something is incomplete. The above explanation also shows that an extra effort will be needed to keep in sync all the documents that cover this subject. Hopefully, important changes and definitions will not be missed from all documents based on the assumption that they'd be covered elsewhere. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Welcome to xsl-list, kalpana rawat | Thread | [xsl] Re: Adding structure to a doc, Yang |
[xsl] Re: Welcome to xsl-list, kalpana rawat | Date | [xsl] Re: Adding structure to a doc, Yang |
Month |