Subject: [xsl] Re: Re: Re: XSLT and parallel processing (Was: RE: XSL-List Digest V3 #1125) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 06:56:05 -0700 (PDT) |
> just to add my 2p, > > i have been playing around with HaXml for awhile now, in other unrelated > activities; > > though i am not the first to suggest it; its quite apparant that one could > convert xslt to Haskell, then go from there to take advantage of parallel > processing, then of course we wouldnt be doing XSLT anymore. Jim, What an idea! Then it would no longer be necessary to try to put together a position paper on the benefits of higher-order functions and to try to convince the xf: (XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators) and XPath 2.0 Data Model authors that XPath needs higher-order functions and should not be polluted with unnecessary constructs instead. I've been reading a Haskell introduction for a while and am really considering moving to it. Or why not do it the other way around -- use Haskell as the new XPath? This is just a single extension function away... and let other people, who have more time, argue with editors of W3 groups... :o)) Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] SAXON and UTF-8, Scott Carter | Thread | [xsl] Re: RE: Re: XSLT and parallel, Dimitre Novatchev |
RE: [xsl] SAXON and UTF-8, Julian Reschke | Date | [xsl] Re: RE: Re: XSLT and parallel, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |