Subject: RE: [xsl] SAXON and UTF-8 From: "Scott Carter" <scottc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:31:11 -0600 |
Please see the following FAQ entry from the Unicode web site: http://www.unicode.org/unicode/faq/utf_bom.html#25. Scott Carter TurboPower Software > -----Original Message----- > From: Goetz Bock [mailto:bock@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:19 AM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] SAXON and UTF-8 > > > > On Thu, Sep 27 '01 at 15:47, Julian Reschke wrote: > > But then maybe it's the missing support for UTF-8 Byte Order Marks? > UTF-8 does not feature a Byte Order Mark, only UTF-16 does. > > An xml file must either start with an BOM, than it is UTF-16, or <? > than it's what ever encoding is defines. Note that all characters in > the xml decleration: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?> > > must be ASCII 7bit (what AFAIK is the same for all Unicode encodings). > > BTW: The original author already noted, that the error is 1477 bytes > into the docukent. So this mail is just to fight the FUD. > > -- > Goetz Bock IT Consultant > Dipl.-Inf. Univ. > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] SAXON and UTF-8, Dimitar Peikov | Thread | RE: [xsl] SAXON and UTF-8, Scott Carter |
Re: [xsl] SAXON and UTF-8, Goetz Bock | Date | RE: [xsl] SAXON and UTF-8, Julian Reschke |
Month |