Subject: Re: [xsl] Well-balanced fragments as input to XSLT 2.0? From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:03:05 +0000 |
Good point - I am in fact handing XSLT a document containing a well-balanced fragment which was generated by XSLT, but I don't yet know if I can get hold of the output of the previous transform as a DOM. In which case it's the parser being unhelpful, rather than XSLT being non-compliant. Francis. David Carlisle wrote: > > > Do you think this would count as a non-compliance? > > well I would have thought "no", on the grounds that it's unreasonable > (perhaps) for XSLT to expect to be handed something that the underlying > parser is not forced to support, but the actual text doesn't make this a > "may" it says that the conditions "are" relaxed, > > so arguably it is a non compliant not to support this. > > David > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further > information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call > Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Well-balanced fragments a, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Well-balanced fragments a, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Localising Submit/Clear b, Ian Blizard | Date | [xsl] Re: XSL-List Digest V3 #1251,, challa sumalatha |
Month |