|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Re: order of UNIONs From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:07:19 GMT |
> about node-set theory?
not "node-set theory", but "set theory". Sets are just a mathematical
abstraction of an unordered collection, normally using the syntax
{..} so the set {1,2,3} is the same set as {3,2,1} and {3,3,2,2,3,1,1}
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Re: Re: order of UNIONs, Jörg Heinicke | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Re: order of UNIONs, Jeni Tennison |
| RE: [xsl] xls to XML, Utah Ingersoll | Date | RE: [xsl] Call context within a nam, Robert Stuart |
| Month |