Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML From: sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 23:33:49 +0000 |
David Carlisle writes: > Not "good" to to our high standards but > http://www.renderx.com/Demos/fo2html/xml.fo.html > is actually valid HTML+CSS1 which is more than can be said for 90% of > the pages out there. for what thats worth... > Anyway if you do it client side, in the browser, this is essentialy > an implemenation of FO in the browser, in which case it doesn't really > matter much what the HTML's like it's just some internal rendering spec. ah, yes, web delivery of .fo. Nice idea! And it could happen on the server too. but really, this reminds me (and no doubt David) of the TeX people trying to promote DVI as an interchange medium. What are these orphaned .fo files? dont they have XML parents? sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML, Chris Bayes | Date | RE: [xsl] XSL stylesheet for XHTML, sebastian . rahtz |
Month |