Subject: [xsl] disable-output-escaping From: Mulberry Technologies List Owner <xsl-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:19:03 -0500 |
From: Ed Blachman <EdB@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" Subject: disable-output-escaping Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:43:51 -0500 Something Jeni T wrote recently caught my eye: the oft-repeated admonition to avoid the use of disable-output-escaping because it might not work in all processors. I know that's how the spec is written. I'm reasonably familiar (and in agreement) with the other strong arguments against the use of disable-output-escaping. But what came to mind today was this question: *which* XSLT processors don't support disable-output-escaping? All the ones I've used do support it, though I "don't get out much", having used only xalan-j 1.0.1 and 2.2.D9, saxon 6.2.2 and 6.4.3, msxml 3.0 (briefly) and jd.xslt 1.0.9 and its successors. Are there notable XSLT processors "in the wild" that really don't support disable-output-escaping? Ed Blachman XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Divide and Conquer implem, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | RE: [xsl] disable-output-escaping, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Selection based on date c, Jeff Beadle | Date | [xsl] Rendering HTML via XSLT with , Magick, Brian |
Month |