Subject: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl]   is being displayed as Á From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:35:53 +0100 |
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kevin Burges > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:17 PM > To: David Carlisle > Subject: [xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl]   is > being displayed as Á > > > > >> I don't understand. When I put the output into IE it displays " ". The > > DC> in that case you must have used disable-output-encoding, > without telling > DC> us. > > Yes sorry, I forgot to write that in the post. > > DC> Searching the archives of this list will show you plenty of > DC> messages discussing d-o-e, and why usually it's a bad idea. > > I've been reading most of the posts, and I understand why in most > cases it is bad. I don't particularly see why it is bad in my > example where I just want to create a   in an HTML file so it can > be understood easier by IE. For instance, it won't work in Mozilla. Why not just stick with the portable method? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE: [x, Kevin Burges | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE, David Carlisle |
[xsl] Re: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl], Kevin Burges | Date | [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl]   is, Julian Reschke |
Month |