Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2.0 From: "David Rosenborg" <david.rosenborg@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:21:06 +0100 |
Mike Kay wrote: > It's good to see comments on the drafts, but please do send your reactions > to the official feedback address. Some members of both working groups read > this list but not everyone does; and it's really best if what reaches the > groups isn't filtered by people like me who will inevitably want to pass > some comments on and not others. Hmm, maybe it's just me, but I think it's pretty strange if not every member, working actively with XSLT/XPath, monitor this list to at least some degree. (BTW, I sent a copy to the XPath comments address, but it never showed up, at least not in the archives, maybe there is some latency and/or moderator sitting in between?) Cheers </David> David Rosenborg Pantor Engineering AB XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2., Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2., Zarella Rendon |
Re: [xsl] A paranoic XPath 2.0 ques, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] How can I avoid generatin, thomas |
Month |