Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: XPath incompatibilities From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:08:49 -0000 |
> > ======================================== > > 12. If an arithmetic operator is applied to an operand that is a > > sequence of two or more nodes, at XPath 1.0 the numeric value of the > > first node in the sequence was used. At XPath 2.0, this is an error. > > (The current XPath 2.0 specification does not invoke fallback > > conversion in this case). > > ---------------------------------------- > > WHY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????????????????????????????/ > > In some cases, the incompatibilities that are documented in the WD were discovered at a late stage of drafting: this is such an example. I don't think this one was introduced deliberately after a considered debate, in fact, my personal opinion is that it's a bug - but I might be wrong. We're talking about work in progress. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: XPath incompatibiliti, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: XPath incompatibiliti, Joerg Pietschmann |
RE: [xsl] Re: XPath incompatibiliti, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Re: result = node1 * node2 an, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |