Subject: RE: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates de-mystified From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:08:29 -0000 |
> > Also note common error #2 - t > This one I did know, even if my message fell into the hole:-) > (although it would probably be less error prone if for > changed the focus > so that . was the inner most bound variable.) (Mike?) > Or even if it returned the error object. Raise a comment on xpath-comments, and it will get back on the agenda. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , David Carlisle |
[xsl] How to pick and choose nodes , Khalid | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: RE: Postional predica, Michael Kay |
Month |