RE: mapping (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for)

[DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx]

> From: Joerg Pietschmann 

> If Jeni's proposal for having XSLT functions constructing sequences
> is accepted, this should be perfectly possible. I'd omit unnecessary
> spaces and parenthesis:
>  select='map(fnA(), map(fnb(), $departments))'
> or
>  select='map(my:fnA, map(my:fnb, $departments))'

I kind of like the nested parenthesis, since it keeps the
regularity from xslt1.

<grin/>I did say I'd leave syntax to others more in the know!

I really would like to see this as part of rev 2.0.
  With Jeni's sequences it would make a powerful pairing.
Regards DaveP

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list