Subject: Re: [xsl] apply template within call template From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:13:05 -0000 |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joerg Pietschmann" <joerg.pietschmann@xxxxxx> To: "XSL List" <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:06 AM Subject: Re: [xsl] apply template within call template > "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [rearranged] > > sometimes people confuse recursion with circular references, the above is a > > circular reference. > > Jim, i thought you knew better! The code snippet > <xsl:template name="test"> > <xsl:call-template name="test"/> > </xsl:template> > is perfectly legal, and it's recursion. Of course, it would > run forever provided infinite ressources. In order to make it recursion never runs forever, as for the XSLT world yes the above is perfectly legal ( and completely useless, so i have no prob telling someone to not use it ! ), though i have to admit that allowing something to run infinately would eventual invalidate the 'no side effect rule'..... in math terms, u will find that recursion is always considered to 'bottom out', though admittedly a condition that converges to infinity can be considered ( in some systems ) a 'bottoming out' as the function attains a steady state, but unfortunately, if i was being pedantic this still is not the classic definition of recursion, which of course has been modified through computer use of the term. oh well, random useless math knowledge. chow, jim fuller XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] apply template within cal, Joerg Pietschmann | Thread | [xsl] XSLT Repository, Lee Goddard |
RE: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, Bryan Rasmussen | Date | [xsl] XSLT Repository, Lee Goddard |
Month |