Subject: Re: [xsl] Function arguments (was regexps once) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 01:33:26 GMT |
> Fortunately, given a particular stylesheet in a particular location, > none of this impacts on what the functions will return for a > particular set of arguments. So you can guarantee that it doesn't > change during the lifetime of the transformation ( Not for document() (I think), if external entities or xsl:import/xsl:include mean that different parts of the stylesheet have different base uri's I think the relative uri will be resolved differently. You'd have to say that the effective argument (or required type) of the function was an absolute uri and that any handling of relative uri references was part of a coercion before calling the function to get the arguments in the right form. So that document is always "really" called with an absolute uri and always returns the same result given that uri. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Function arguments (was r, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] Function arguments (was r, Jeni Tennison |
Re: Regular expression functions (W, Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] Trouble writing .xsl, Jason Rizer |
Month |