Subject: Re: [xsl] Function arguments (was regexps once) From: Joerg Pietschmann <joerg.pietschmann@xxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:55:45 +0100 |
Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > IMHO user defined functions should not depent implicitely of the > > context where they are called... > It also undermines the equality between: [ calling named templates and <xsl:copy-of select="my:foo()" /> ] That's a valid point. I didn't remember that named templates inherit the context from where they were called, probably because i've been bitten a few times by this feature and i now prefer to pass everything through parameters, even ".". Regards J.Pietschmann XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Function arguments (was r, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] Function arguments (was r, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] Not a limerick, cutlass | Date | Re: [xsl] Function arguments (was r, Jeni Tennison |
Month |