Subject: Re: mapping (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for) From: Joerg Pietschmann <joerg.pietschmann@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:47:24 +0100 |
M.Kay wrote: > Now you're confusing me. How can "expression" be supplied as an argument to > a function if expressions are not a data type? Funnily enough, the F&O draft specifies: xf:filter(expression $srcval) => node* thereby suggesting "expression" is already a data type (though surely something else is meant). Regards J.Pietschmann XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: mapping (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . i, Joerg Pietschmann | Thread | [xsl] RE: mapping (Was: Re: Re: . i, Dimitre Novatchev |
RE: [xsl] Not a nested for loop., DPawson | Date | Re: [xsl] Higher-Order Functions in, Jeni Tennison |
Month |