Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt/xpath 2.0 comments ( long ) From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:04:16 -0000 |
> I might be misunderstanding you, but it seems to me that given that > the user is writing a wrapper function, they should be putting that > wrapper function in their own namespace rather than the one for > Saxon extensions. So this is consistent with or supports the idea > of the processor giving an error when one of its extension functions > are redefined. Of course they should use their own namespace. But when writing the spec, we have to say what happens if they don't. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xslt/xpath 2.0 comments (, naha | Thread | [xsl] xslt extensions - whats it ab, peter gibbons |
RE: [xsl] alternating bg colour in , Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT match with regex wha, Michael Kay |
Month |