Subject: RE: [xsl] Converting logical <em>s to physical <i>s (nesting prob lem) From: Joshua.Kuswadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:17:15 +1100 |
<snip /> > <xsl:otherwise> > </em><xsl:apply-templates/><em> > </xsl:otherwise> <snip /> > failing only because the contents of the "otherwise" clause aren't > nested properly. Hi Michael, What if you use: <xsl:otherwise> </em><xsl:apply-templates/><em> </xsl;otherwise> I'm not sure if you need to put the '</em>' in <xsl:text> elements ?!? HTH, Joshua ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message and any attachment is confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Get an element with max. , bryan . s . schnabel | Thread | Re: [xsl] Converting logical <em>s , David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Re: RE: Higher-Order Func, Terje Norderhaug | Date | Re: [xsl] Converting logical <em>s , David Carlisle |
Month |