Subject: RE: [xsl] Saxon6.0.2: user written extensions From: Xiaocun Xu <xiaocunxu@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:36:58 -0800 (PST) |
Yeah, I would very much wish to upgrade to a newer release. But due to we still use Xerces1.2.0 and that it is incomptiable with newer Saxon (in particular Saxon6.4.3 which I tried), it would require the upgrade of Xerces from 1.2.0 to 1.4.4. Given the aggressive release schedule we have, we just don't have the time to do all of these before I implement this functionality: attribute name mapping. Unfortunely I no longer can find a full download of Saxon6.0.2 including documentation. I was able to dig out a full download of Saxon5.5.1 and found the document extensibility.html dated 7/24/00. Is this applicable to Saxon6.0.2? If I go with this approach, how difficult would it be to migrate to a later Saxon release such as 7.0? Besides extension function and template, what other alternatives I may have? Much thanks, Xiaocun --- Michael Kay <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, it's possible to write user-written extension > functions (in Java) using > releases of Saxon well before 6.0.2, see the > extensibility.html file for > details. But it's a very old release, please don't > expect any help. But I do > think you would find it worth your while to use a > newer release. > > Mike Kay > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On > Behalf Of Xiaocun Xu > > Sent: 18 January 2002 14:02 > > To: xsl-list > > Subject: [xsl] Saxon6.0.2: user written extensions > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I am interested to implement Jeni's > recommendation > > for attribute name mapping via mapping XML (Re: > [xsl] > > change a list of attribute name). I thought the > most > > efficient way to handle this would be through user > > written extension functions. > > The situation I have right now is our > application > > currently uses Saxon6.0.2 (started to use a year > ago) > > and Xerces1.2.0. I tried to upgrade to > Saxon6.4.3, > > but that had collision with Xerces1.2.0 (which I > had > > to put Saxon6.4.3 in front of Xerces1.2.0 in the > > classpath to get around). We probably won't have > time > > to upgrade both to Saxon6.4.3 and Xerces1.4.4 > until > > the next major release. > > With my current situation, is it possible to > write > > user written extension functions? If not, the > only > > alternative is via templates? > > > > Much thanks, > > Xiaocun > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! > > http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ > > > > XSL-List info and archive: > http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > > > > XSL-List info and archive: > http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Saxon6.0.2: user written , Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Saxon6.0.2: user written , Michael Kay |
[xsl] Parsing XML through VB, kalpana rawat | Date | [xsl] class loading problem with XA, Dayanand Reddy |
Month |