Subject: Re: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why XSLT is better than JSP+Velocity From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:48:30 -0800 |
one thing I haven't heard mentioned is that XSLT is XML. This allows you many more opportunites than a non-well-formed .jsp best, -Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:31 PM Subject: RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why XSLT is better than JSP+Velocity > > They know Java, they argue, so why bother with XSLT? > > One good reason: Java doesn't do the job easily. > > Since they should be separation presentation from business logic (least of > all database logic) they should already understand that Java is not a > presentation language (not that HTML is much better, but that's another > problem). There is a mismatch between the job to be done and the tool > (Java). Having Java tools create XML for presentation manipulation via > XSLt is a good architectural separation of function that allows each tool to > do what it is good at. > > I would also agree that you should consider eliminating JSP's altogether. > With a good XML/XSLt framework the days of having to mix presentation > semantics and syntax should be rapidly disappearing. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Hunsberger, Peter | Thread | RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Hunsberger, Peter |
RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Hunsberger, Peter | Date | RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Bryan Kearney |
Month |