RE: [xsl] basic question about xpath support of xml schema

Subject: RE: [xsl] basic question about xpath support of xml schema
From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:42:38 -0000
Mike said:
> I mean we could try and define the extensibility mechanisms and the
> conformance rules such that an implementor who wanted to 
> support something
> like RELAX could extend the language to do so.

So W3C are prepared to positively support W3C schemas,
yet require those using other schemas to use extensions?

What is that American word? IEEE were very keen on it,
having been prosecuted for it on a couple of occasions?

Regards DaveP

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 

14th June 2002 is RNIB Look Loud Day - visit http://www.lookloud.org.uk to
find out all about it.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread