|
Subject: [xsl] Re: RE: Re: Re: An issue with XPath 2.0 sequences (Was Re: RE: Muenchian method, and keys 'n stuff) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 07:03:27 -0800 (PST) |
> I'm puzzled why you should say that, because I've never seen anyone > complain that when you do book/chapter/para you get back a "flat" > list of <para> elements rather than a sequence of sequences of > sequences. Even this is limited -- there's no way using a XPath1 node-set to imitate a sequence having two identical nodes. Therefore, some problems will require really a ***sequence*** that can have sequences as elements. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Re: Re: Re: Re: An issue with, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Muenchian technique, a proble, DPawson |
| RE: [xsl] Optimization, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Namespace wildcards, Elliotte Rusty Harol |
| Month |