Subject: Re: content management stuff - was -> Re: [xsl] a simple case study From: Mulberry Technologies List Owner <xsl-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 13:03:55 -0400 |
>Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:55:08 -0600 >From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: content management stuff - was -> Re: [xsl] a simple case study >Reply-To: Matt Gushee <mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >Yes, this is true. Although it is voluntery to subscribe to this or any >> >other list... so the volume is not a prob, as far as I can see. But about > >It's a problem if you care about alienating people who might be valuable >contributors to the discussion. One of the people I know who refuses to >subscribe is Uche Ogbuji, whose name may be known to many of you. FWIW. > >-- >Matt Gushee >Englewood, Colorado, USA >mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >http://www.havenrock.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: content management stuff - was , B. Tommie Usdin | Thread | Re: content management stuff - was , Robert Koberg |
Re: [xsl] Extending xsltproc?, Gary Lawrence Murphy | Date | [xsl] string replacement for HTML t, Daniel Fisher |
Month |