Subject: RE: [xsl] Document() and & From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 07:35:30 +0100 |
> On the other hand, the version of Xalan 1 that I tried > claimed that the url was malformed, and that's wrong. That's a bug. > > So you need to determine whether the operation fails because > an html file is not well-formed, or because the xslt > processor has a problem with the url syntax - which would be > a bug because that syntax is correct. > Technically not a bug but a restriction: it's entirely up to the XSLT implementor to decide what forms of URL are supported. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Document() and &, Thomas B. Passin | Thread | Re: [xsl] Document() and &, Oleg Tkachenko |
RE: [xsl] Regarding XSL performance, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] testing for following sib, Michael Kay |
Month |