Subject: Re: [xsl] Conditional document merge From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 19:45:48 +0100 |
> > I believe I can pick up on the missing elements as soon as I've passed them > by. If I have two sorted trees to compare and in one I go from A to C and in > the other I go from A to B then I know I've missed B in the first? But only if you have some specification of the order other than "the order in which they appear". By using "A" and "C" above you are implying alphabetic order and so its not hard to spot B is missing but in your example you said the order of the elements in the two docs could be different so how in that case do I know B is missing rather than just later in the order? David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Conditional document merg, Hunsberger, Peter | Thread | RE: [xsl] Conditional document merg, Hunsberger, Peter |
[xsl] Re: Problem with namespaces w, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO Java API, J.Pietschmann |
Month |