Subject: Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:14:06 +0100 |
Mike> I don't think we have allowed the Mike> existence of these types to bloat the language at all. I just tried (again) to read section 6 of F&O. I find it hard to reconcile what I see there with your statement above. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, bryan | Thread | Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Thomas B. Passin | Date | Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Jeni Tennison |
Month |